Equicontinuity of a family of functions #

Let X be a topological space and α a UniformSpace. A family of functions F : ι → X → α is said to be equicontinuous at a point x₀ : X when, for any entourage U in α, there is a neighborhood V of x₀ such that, for all x ∈ V, and for all i, F i x is U-close to F i x₀. In other words, one has ∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U. For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, ∀ i, dist x₀ x < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε.

F is said to be equicontinuous if it is equicontinuous at each point.

A closely related concept is that of uniform equicontinuity of a family of functions F : ι → β → α between uniform spaces, which means that, for any entourage U in α, there is an entourage V in β such that, if x and y are V-close, then for all i, F i x and F i y are U-close. In other words, one has ∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U. For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x y, ∀ i, dist x y < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε.

Main definitions #

EquicontinuousAt: equicontinuity of a family of functions at a point
Equicontinuous: equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
UniformEquicontinuous: uniform equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain

We also introduce relative versions, namely EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousOn and UniformEquicontinuousOn, akin to ContinuousWithinAt, ContinuousOn and UniformContinuousOn respectively.

Main statements #

equicontinuous_iff_continuous: equicontinuity can be expressed as a simple continuity condition between well-chosen function spaces. This is really useful for building up the theory.
Equicontinuous.closure: if a set of functions is equicontinuous, its closure for the topology of pointwise convergence is also equicontinuous.

Notations #

Throughout this file, we use :

ι, κ for indexing types
X, Y, Z for topological spaces
α, β, γ for uniform spaces

Implementation details #

We choose to express equicontinuity as a properties of indexed families of functions rather than sets of functions for the following reasons:

it is really easy to express equicontinuity of H : Set (X → α) using our setup: it is just equicontinuity of the family (↑) : ↥H → (X → α). On the other hand, going the other way around would require working with the range of the family, which is always annoying because it introduces useless existentials.
in most applications, one doesn't work with bare functions but with a more specific hom type hom. Equicontinuity of a set H : Set hom would then have to be expressed as equicontinuity of coe_fn '' H, which is super annoying to work with. This is much simpler with families, because equicontinuity of a family 𝓕 : ι → hom would simply be expressed as equicontinuity of coe_fn ∘ 𝓕, which doesn't introduce any nasty existentials.

To simplify statements, we do provide abbreviations Set.EquicontinuousAt, Set.Equicontinuous and Set.UniformEquicontinuous asserting the corresponding fact about the family (↑) : ↥H → (X → α) where H : Set (X → α). Note however that these won't work for sets of hom types, and in that case one should go back to the family definition rather than using Set.image.

References #

[N. Bourbaki, General Topology, Chapter X][bourbaki1966]

Tags #

equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli