Monoidal categories #

A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator. In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions

tensorObj : C → C → C
tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂)) and allow use of the overloaded notation ⊗ for both. The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.

The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via tensor : C × C ⥤ C. The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural isomorphisms in leftUnitor_nat_iso, rightUnitor_nat_iso and associator_nat_iso.

Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem, e.g. (λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom in CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas.

Implementation notes #

In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:

whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂, denoted by X ◁ f,
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y, denoted by f ▷ Y. These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering" is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms tensorHom can be defined in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by tensorHom_def and tensorHom_def'. By default, tensorHom is defined so that tensorHom_def holds definitionally.

If you want to provide tensorHom and define whiskerLeft and whiskerRight in terms of it, you can use the alternative constructor CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom.

The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.

Simp-normal form for morphisms #

Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing performed by the coherence tactic.

The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of parentheses. More precisely,

it is a composition of morphisms like f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅ such that each fᵢ is either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors) or non-structural morphisms, and
each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅, where each Xᵢ is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and f is a non-structural morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.

Note that X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅ is actually X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅))).

Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite 𝟙 X ⊗ f and f ⊗ 𝟙 Y into X ◁ f and f ▷ Y, respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.

References #

Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK.